Contribution of geophysical methods to explaining water flow in a carbonate medium Favray site (Nièvre, France)
Entrées d’indexHaut de page
Texte intégral en libre accès disponible depuis le 30 octobre 2011.
1Thegeologic formations of the study area, limestone and chalky limestone belong to upper Oxfordian and lower Kimeridgian. Two springs; Fontbout (70 l/s) and Favray (300 l/s) are situated in this area. Those two springs are witness to the existence of a water reservoir of important volume. The similarity of the results of their hydro-chemical analysis shows that they belong to the same aquifer.
2The direction of water flow in the studied area is NW–SE, the springs are located in the southeast and several wells have been dug in the same area: While some of them are productive, others are dry, although they are close to one another. The aims of study are to explain the reasons why one of the two springs is dry during the dry period while the other is not, although both belong to the same aquifer, and also to identify the geological environment in which some existing wells are productive and others are non- or half-productive by using a geophysical parameter, electrical resistivity. Three different geophysical techniques have been used in a complementary way in order to:
Locate the impermeable substratum.
Define the geometry of the structure responsible for the issue of the two springs.
Determine the nature of principal facies which could influence regional hydrogeological phenomena.
3A very low frequency (VLF) resistivity map was achieved first; it gave us the first synthesis by giving detailed indications of fractured zones which feed separately the two springs. The results were corroborated by 10 Wenner electrical profiles.
4A second synthesis of the vertical structure was performed with the help of ERT (electrical resistivity tomography) and VES (vertical electrical sounding), in fact 85 Schlumberger VES and 2 tomographies. It gave detailed indications of the heterogeneity of the different geological formations, especially the one which we consider its lower part as the substratum with high resistivity (400-1200 ohm.m) , and the upper part as the aquifer with low resistivity (80-120 ohm.m). These results were obtained by a geo-electrical calibration using five of the existing wells situated in the studied area: a well in the northwestern part, two wells in the south and two wells in the east.
5The contour map of VLF resistivity gave a first synthesis of lateral variations with:
a network of fractures masked by the cultivated horizon, feeding the area of the springs on the studied site.
horizontal heterogeneity in the same aquifer, revealing the importance of the scale effect in geophysical prospection.
6The vertical structure, determined with the help of VES and ERT, gave detailed indications of:
tectonic and lithologic structure of the stratigraphic series (establishment of a synthetic log and calibration of the vertical resistivity variation);
vertical lithologic heterogeneity inside the geological formation playing the role of principal aquifer.
7A synthesis of previous results shows that the functioning of the studied aquifer can be explained by the existence of a natural barrage opposite to regional flow. This hypothesis was verified by sounding techniques.
8The VES results in figure 1 present first the anisotropy of aquifer formation and secondly, seasonal variation. This study of anisotropy shows that aquifer formation owns a low apparent resistivity toward the source and agrees with the regional hydro-geological water flow from NW to SE, where the source is situated. Apparent resistivities in the perpendicular direction are higher. The seasonal study illustrates that the aquifer is divided into two layers; low apparent resistivity above higher apparent resistivity. The thickness of the upper geo-electrical layer changes depending on the seasons, i.e., the water bearing horizon increases in autumn and decreases in summer. Note that the thickness of the substratum (high apparent resistivity) does not change.
Figure 2 demonstrates the existence of the substratum layer (NE-SW) behind the outcoming spring opposite to the direction of water flow (NW-SE).
Figure 3 shows that the spring exists in a conductor horizon. This spring is located above a resistant substratum.
The obtained results using electrical resistivity tomography are satisfactorily correlated with the results of the electrical sounding and VLF methods.
9The interpretation of electrical soundings showed that there exists a vertical and horizontal change in the geological formation which supplies the five wells located in the studied zone. This geological formation, which is called ‘before reef’, presents a low apparent resistivity to a depth of about 20 m, and corresponds to chalky and bioclastic high porosity limestone; below this, it starts to become more resistant, forming a base which is micritic and sub lithographic.
10We conclude that Favray spring which is not influenced by dry periods is situated at the interface of this change of facies and is fed by the NW-SE regional water flow, although the slope of the geological layers is the NW direction. The fact that Favray spring is not influenced by dry periods is due to the triple nature of its feeding: (1) a net of fractures in connection with the spring, (2) the above mentioned change of facies (chalky and bioclastic low resistivity above the denser and less permeable sublithographic), and (3) an easy water flow from the NW towards the spring situated in the SE part corresponding to lower resistivity anisotropy.
11Fontbout spring is situated in the resistive part of the aquifer (substratum) and is fed only by local overlying fractures, which are mostly influenced by seasonal rainfall.
12The barrier corresponds to an outcrop resistive reef.
13The study has provided a model of water flow and proven the existence of barrage. The model could be used as a reference to be applied in other regions with comparable components (water flow different from the slope of the layers and heterogeneity of the layers with lateral and vertical changes).
We would like to thank the Head, Department of Applied Geophysics, University of Pierre and Marie Curie, for providing the materials.
Table des illustrations
|Titre||Figure 1: Anisotropy and seasonal measurements.|
|Titre||Figure 2: Electrical resistivity tomography.|
|Titre||Figure 3: Electrical resistivity images at 40,50,60,70 and 90 metres.|
Pour citer cet article
Mohammad Hamidi, Asal Sirhan et Pierre Andrieux, « Contribution of geophysical methods to explaining water flow in a carbonate medium Favray site (Nièvre, France) », ArcheoSciences, 33 (suppl.) | 2009, 183-185.
Mohammad Hamidi, Asal Sirhan et Pierre Andrieux, « Contribution of geophysical methods to explaining water flow in a carbonate medium Favray site (Nièvre, France) », ArcheoSciences [En ligne], 33 (suppl.) | 2009, mis en ligne le 30 octobre 2011, consulté le 19 septembre 2014. URL : http://archeosciences.revues.org/1550Haut de page
Tous droits réservésHaut de page